README headless-verification list is stale — xp.js and strategic.js not mentioned #8
Labels
No labels
blocked:needs-attention
blocked:needs-decision
blocked:needs-decompose
blocked:needs-design
blocked:needs-triage
blocked:unclassified
bug
documentation
enhancement
gsd-spec
in-progress
needs-decompose
priority:high
priority:low
priority:medium
quickfix
test
triage-approved
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
Mark/cybertactics#8
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
The README's
## Headless verificationsection enumerates 5 of the 6 node-based smokes (smoke 0/1/2, saveload, teams, research). It does not mentiontools/xp.jsortools/strategic.js. CI (.forgejo/workflows/ci.yml) runs both, plus the others. Real verification coverage is broader than the README claims; either update README to match CI, or trim CI to match README.What to do
Update the
## Headless verificationsection to list all seven tools verbatim fromci.yml. Include a one-liner per tool about what it asserts (already in each tool's header comment — copy fromtools/*.jsfirst lines). Keep thenode tools/smoke.js 2call with its current comment about intentionally losing by design.Acceptance
Diff
## Headless verificationagainst the actual.forgejo/workflows/ci.ymlrun:lines: every CI invocation appears in the section with a brief assertion summary.Labels
documentationDirect-fix landed at
b6f0211on origin/main. The README's## Headless verificationsection now mirrors everyrun:line in.forgejo/workflows/ci.yml(smoke 0/1/2, saveload, teams, research, strategic, xp, playwright, godot_import_check). Each one-liner was refreshed from the matching tool's own header comment. The smoke 2 line is preserved with its 'loses by design' comment per the issue body. Closing the closing-paragraph 'all seven' wording too.